Climate Change is of no Concern to US Government

Today the US Government dropped the funding for its weather observation program. The decision was made due to "...skyrocketing costs." It seems that the very program that worked so hard at predicting our weather and giving the data to science to "prove" climate change and the potential end of current civilization... just costs too much.

As you may know, from my other blog writings, I don't believe in human caused climate change. ("Human Extinction Through Ignorance" is my blog on climate change, its causes and our alternatives.) I do know the climate is changing and do not dispute that. But we cause hundreds of times less greenhouse gasses per year than the ocean makes not the mention the decomposition of vegetation that makes more than the oceans. The humans make just a little more carbon dioxide per year than the natural gassing of Earths core via volcanic activity.

The reasons why I believe we are being lied to about the cause of global warming is covered in my blog "Climate Change and Globalization are Linked" I will not cover them again here.

Back to the point... the current administration is cutting the information gathering network that has the most hope of being able to untangle the "global warming debate." It seems that now the "science is in" they wanna dismantle the tools that brought us that science to prevent it from being used against them. It seems so typical for this administration.

They have cut funding to, or fired/forced resignation of, every form of opposition to their broader goals. At this point it seems that the oil companies are going to profit from "climate change." I will explain.

In order to change the country from gas to electric all we must do is get rid of gas powered automobiles. That is all. Then all oil will be good for is creating power. The oil companies are invested in refineries and pipelines and cant just change this overnight. They don't build any more refineries, and haven't for years, because they know the future of energy and see it would be a waste of money. They need to build combination oil well-power plants that store all the toxic emissions in the very wells the oil is coming out of. The export from these is pure energy.

To do this costs lots of money in R&D (research and development) that the oil companies have... but would rather not spend. Not if they can convince the American public that the planet is heating up and going to kill us all if we don't start forcing our government to find alternatives. Thus most, to all, of the R&D will be paid for by the government along with the conversion costs from refinery to power plant. These oil companies just stand to gain from the fear generated from the absolute trite of 'human caused climate change.'

Don't get me wrong, I would love a quieter world without mini-explosions happening countless times each minute all around me. The air would be cleaner and just a better life in general.

But let us not forget what facilitates our world pollution. The companies that have caused it should not be rewarded with government money for R&D or any other reason due to they are knowingly irresponsible, willing facilitators, without regard for the effects of their product on our planet and our lives, and have been for years.

We should hold them responsible for the reversing of any damage their product has caused.

What will happen is they will ride the 'climate change' fear until the people force the government to fund the "Global Power Grid" transition. It seems that the powers-that-be are dismantling any way to analyse the climate and draw new, more accurate, or any other conclusions than the one permeating the public mind.

My guess is that the program that was shut down today was beginning to show evidence that could be used to prove that humans are not a cause of climate change and that the planet we live on is on a natural sway in temperature, much like the repeated ice-ages.

My point is: If climate change is a human caused problem, why is the US government not willing to pay any amount of money to study, and possibly prevent, the end of civilization?

My answer is the cause is a deception based on weather data of less than 100 years, and discounts all the geological data in opposition. The oil companies know they are the only ones that can meet our future energy needs. That we cant hold them accountable for the product they pedal without bankrupting them and thus ruining the global economy. They need the public fear to force our government to "give" them billions of more dollars to make them ecologically safe, instead of fining them billions for the destruction of our ecosystem.

When the public gets word that the climate is way beyond human control or ability to effect in any way, the profiteers of the climate change solution can simply state "better safe than sorry!" and "there was no way to prove we weren't causing it." (example: WMDs in Iraq!) But there would be proof, perhaps, if we were not currently covering our tracks by destroying our climate observation programs.

Climate Change and Globalization are Linked

If the blame for the causes of climate change are purposefully being misrepresented to the people of the world (video link to "Global Warming Swindle" is in video section on right side of this page), to what end? By whom? Who would stand to gain from the restriction of industrialization of third world nations and the stagnation of the first worlds. The very people that own the oil.

Why would the corporations that make billions and billions of dollars want to cut global use of their product? Easy, Globalization. This G-20 (G-8 plus 12) think tank thing has a plan. Right now they are stirring up fear and change so that our R&D will go into developing electric vehicles that satisfy human needs. Because the future of energy IS oil (turned cleanly into "power")...and they are getting it all while devaluing it.

You see the future of energy trade will not involve the ridiculous pipelines and the shipping of tankers full of this stuff half way around the world. That is just plain expensive and it is way too dangerous for our environment. I see the future global energy supply consisting of the export and import of raw electricity/power.

Oil will be pumped to a local processing plant where it will be made into electric (or alternative) power and exported via a world wide power grid. This is why Halliburton is setting up shop in Dubai. It explains our propping up of Egypt's corrupt government and Israel, all these areas we need to put "The Grid" through to Africa.

We are stagnating smaller nations from industrialising so as to have better costumers when it comes time to let them have what we will not allow them to build or mine in their "sovereign" nations right now. This is part of the G-20 "rule set" to help usher in globalization. They need us to demand cheaper cleaner energy for all, and for the sake of the environment, stop shipping it all over and process it at the source into a clean export. Thus these lesser industrial nations will be forced to pay for something they could make on their own.

This "Global Power Grid" is why we find mega-corporations positioning themselves now so they will control the flow of juice to Europe, Africa and Asia out of the Middle-East. Our nation will uncap its wells and be a player in this hemispheres power grid to Canada and Mexico. We will use this new creation to put pressure on any nation attempting independence from "The Grid."

To be clear... I see life in nations that are a part of the Global Grid will be tremendously better than the lives of those without. The pressure for nations to join The Grid will be internal and irresistible.

I also see Globalization, as a whole, as a violent path to peace on Earth. As America we have a leading roll in facilitating the connectivity, and destruction, needed for success. But Globalization is run by unimaginably huge business that the US and its military are just pawns to be used in order to achieve a degree of control over nations via energy policy/"rule sets". After all our future is global security. It really is all the USA can offer to a global economy.

Human Extinction Through Ignorance

Geologic history proves climate change happens. The only dispute is how long the swings take once they have begun and why they are triggered. The 'how long' seems to be between 1 and 1000 years most events seem to be closer to the low end.

For instance an asteroid strike or a massive volcanic eruption (super volcano), like that in Yellowstone and 9 other locations worldwide, would result in immediate changes. The changes have lasted for up to a century in the previous worst case scenarios. Then there is the natural ice ages that occur.

These take much longer to unfold. The geological records show that a slow change in global temperatures leads to a snap and drastic changes in global climate. This is why all the theories that involve the disruption of the oceanic conveyor are being studied currently. It is in an attempt to understand how the snap from global warming to ice age happens.

That is what the whole hoo haa is about. Not that the globe will warm up and kill us. But geology would hint that the temperature will rise for a while and then drop off until an ice age is achieved. Why does the planet leave an ice age? The slow buildup of greenhouse gasses and the desalination of the ocean (would be very salty in an ice age)? Seems logical. If I stretch my imagination I can see an Ice age would cool earths outer crust and thus shrink it enough to constrict the core of the planet. This would result in a more compressed and thus hotter core. To release the pressure... volcanic activity and therefore more greenhouse gasses.

Back to volcanic events and pollution. Even though pollution has taken some 100 years to collect and a volcano is an instant effect, in geological terms they are almost the same. A hundred years in the 4 billion year history of things is small indeed. Yet Earth recovers from huge volcanoes within a several decades of their eruption.

Humans can not even hope to pollute as much as a volcano... even if we tried. The cows we breed are apparently putting out more greenhouse gasses than all of human industry is. Apparently the Earth fixes itself very quickly if it is out of balance, quick enough to repair anything we do.

I think we arrogant humans give ourselves to much credit. We think that we can change this planet by our actions. But lets put our egos in check for a moment and look at the raw powers that are running the living planet EARTH.

First, most all life on earth is fueled by the sun (directly or indirectly). But the sun is a long long LONG way away. We are but a speck of sand a half football field away from a basketball (maybe baseball... cant recall) sized sun. Yet enough light hits this little ball of dust to make the surface team with life. Think of all the space Earth does not occupy in space...and how much energy the sun is REALLY putting out. It is inconceivable. But lets turn inward.

Earth has a molten core. Heavier liquids settle to the bottom/center of gravity. Keep this in mind. In order to cause a nuclear reaction all one must do is put enough uranium in a pile and it happens. That is right, if you can find enough of this pure stuff and gather it together it WILL happen, no catalysts, just a chain reaction resulting in a meltdown. Back to the heavier liquids thing.

The molten core of earth acts as a giant filter. The heavier Uranium molecules will continually gather into areas of equilibrium until a nuclear reaction happens. This is happening all the time in earths core (A. Einsteins' theories say this is how space-time/gravity work.) if gravity does not peeter out as you get closer to the core...which it may (gravity is a push not a pull. Like a ball under water, not like Einstein theorised. In fact E=MC^2 is not mathematically sound and is likely just a publicity stunt. [A Blog I will soon do]) In that case the earth spin and chaos theory would say that uranium would be centrifuged into layers and spread evenly. What I am trying to say is that there is so much going on in the center of our planet that we don't know for sure if it is undergoing a continual nuclear reaction or not. In fact its, once again, an inconcievable uncalculable amount of energy.

As you can see the amount of energy that effects our planet from within, dwarfs the amount of sunlight energy that falls on it (responsible for the weather and all life), and even more so the human effects. This gives us some idea of the power of the current we may be fighting.

If we are to fall into a natural ice age, as it is time to, there is nothing we can do to change it. It has nothing to do with the atmosphere, due to our atmosphere is just a faint reflection of, and derived from, the internal workings of this planet. An ice age is a natural internal fluctuation of earth, and, like a heartbeat, to stop it could be devastating. Besides the amount of energy in a large volcanic eruption is so much more devastating that we humans are, yet, it is just a tiny pinhole vent, into the true power and forces at work within our planet. So the climate change is derived from an internal change in earths core and is a symptom of a far more unavoidable problem.

We are using the FEAR generated by the Global Warming scare, to fight greenhouse gasses, thus gambling the human race on the hope we can fix something that may not even be broke. And if it isn't broke, and is a natural cycle of the planet... we have no power to stop it. Our most powerful creation is a nuke. A nuke is, once again, just a few rocks from the planet we are trying to change. Shouldn't we be concentrating on getting off this planet? The history of the Earth shows one mass extinction after another.

We know for a fact that this planet changes. That it WILL change again. That our only real hope is to colonize the sea and space. And that if we stop its natural cycles, we are indeed asking for trouble. We don't know enough to know what to do. But one thing is for sure:

WE MUST LEAVE OUR PLANET OR WE WILL EVENTUALLY BE EXTINCT...ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.

(please forward to Al Gore) :-)

Comment thread for this blog at Mysterious Universe Forum.